Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Finlayson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 25, 1994No. 92-P-1330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

In this appeal, the defendants question the sufficiency of evidence to support a Superior Court jury’s award of $119,700 on the plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim. At trial, the plaintiff claimed that she suffered thermal severance of her ureter as a result of a laparoscopic examination and cauterization procedure (fulguration of endometriosis) performed by the defendant Dr. Finlayson in 1984. 2 After a dismissal, by stipulation, of a negligence claim, the trial proceeded solely on the issue of whether Dr. Finlayson failed to obtain the plaintiffs informed consent by neglecting to apprise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Halley v. BirbigliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  2. Sonogram of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  3. Feeley v. BaerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Steinhilber v. McCarthyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Hammell v. Shooshanian Engineering Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API