Legal Opinion
Steinhilber v. McCarthy
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 3, 1998No. Civ.A. 95-11078-MBBPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 59 MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL ON ALL ISSUES (DOCKET ENTRY # 80)
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
On April 17,1998, this court entered a final judgment in the above styled medical malpractice case. Thereafter, plaintiffs Carol A. Steinhilber (“Carol Steinhilber”), R. Theodore Steinhilber (“Theodore Steinhilber”), Eric R. Steinhilber (“Eric Steinhilber”) and Heidi A. Steinhilber (“Heidi Steinhilber”) (collectively: “plaintiffs”) filed a timely motion for a new trial under Rule 59(a) (“Rule 59”), Fed-R-Civ-P. 1 (Docket Entry # 80). Defendant James A. McCarthy, M.D.…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adelson v. HananelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- First Act Inc. v. Brook Mays Music Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Adelson v. HananelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Hrichak v. PionDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.