Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. Phelan
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided December 12, 1931No. Civ. A. No. 959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLUCAS, P. J.
Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that for more than fifty years last past there has been in exist*Supp. 782ence and continuous use an irrigating water ditch system known as the Banta ditch; that throughout the entire period of its existence the said ditch system has been owned and operated through a mutual voluntary association known as the Banta Ditch Association and which consists of the land owners within said irrigation district; that a meeting of the members of the association was held on March 4, 1929, and that at said meeting it was decided by unanimous vote that immediate steps…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Lake v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Curnow v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Urton v. WoolseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cook v. WinklepleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. v. Kingfisher CollegeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- All-Cool Aluminum Awning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Haywood v. Amazon.com IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- RS Titan, LLC v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County; Terry Pyle; Larry Schaapman; Judy Wilson; Nelson Cox; Tom FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2026