Legal Opinion

Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. v. Kingfisher College

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1938No. 27664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action involves the validity of a garnishment proceeding growing out of the following facts: In 1923, the Oklahoma Mill Oompany executed certain promissory notes in the approximate sum of $200,000 secured by a real estate mortgage. The notes and mortgage were subsequently assigned to W. B. Newsome, plaintiff. In 1927, the Oklahoma Mill Oompany executed notes for approximately $100,000 to Kingfisher College and others, and secured the same by a second mortgage. In 192S, plaintiff commenced an action to foreclose his notes .and mortgage. The second mortgagees and other parties asserting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Holbrook v. PhelanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baulch v. HolcomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Cimarron Nursing Center v. Armstrong (In Re Cimarron Nursing Center)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Casualty Corporation of America v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CoseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API