Legal Opinion
Murillo v. Seymour Ambulance Ass'n
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 24, 2003No. SC 16809; SC 16842PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The dispositive issue in these consolidated appeals1 is whether the named plaintiff, Anne Marie Murillo,2 who claims to have been injured in a fall when she fainted after observing a medical procedure being performed on her sister, was owed a duty of care by the defendants, Seymour Ambulance Association, Inc. (Seymour), Griffin Hospital (hospital), and their respective employees, Jennifer Fitzpatrick and Helen Zanowiak. After granting the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs complaints for lack of such a duty, the trial court3 rendered judgment in favor of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Perodeau v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Maloney v. ConroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Jaworski v. KiernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Lombard v. Edward J. Peters, Jr., P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Monk v. Temple George Associates, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- April Abigail Guerra v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Munn Ex Rel. C.M. v. Hotchkiss SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.