Legal Opinion
Long Island Trust Co. v. Vendall, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William R. Brenhan, Jr., J.
By its first cause of action the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) seeks to recover against all defendants upon a promissory note made November 3,1961, by the defendant Vendall, Inc., to the order of the Bank, and which was indorsed by the defendants Dewar and Byfield. For convenience, this note will hereinafter be referred to as the Byfield note. The second cause of action seeks to recover against the defendants Vendall, Inc., and Dewar upon a promissory note made by the defendant Vendall, Inc., to the Bank under date of December 27, 1961, which will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Orleans County National Bank v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Harding v. . TifftNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Shipsey v. . Bowery National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Lichtenstein v. Grossman Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v. RathausDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- MTB Bank v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997