Lichtenstein v. Grossman Construction Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We agree with the Appellate Division that section 13 of the Lien Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 33) applies to these hens and that they are vahd to the amount of the labor and material put into each building. The apportionment as made by the referee has been properly affirmed except in one particular. The Globe Tile Co., Inc., furnished labor and material for both buildings in the amount of $9,201. There has been paid to it $6,500, leaving a balance unpaid of $2,701. All of this unpaid balance cannot be charged up against the corner building which has produced a surplus in mortgage foreclosure…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Orleans County National Bank v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Union School District v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Robie v. Estate of BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Carson v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lowden v. Northwestern Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- First National City Bank v. KlineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Van Schaick v. AronNew York Supreme Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.