Legal Opinion

MTB Bank v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 1997No. 93 Civ. 5594 (LBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAND, District Judge.

This action arises from the misdelivery of two shipments of gold by defendant Federal Armored Express (“Federal”) in May, 1993. On August 6, 1996, this Court granted summary judgment for plaintiff MTB Bank *228(“MTB”) on the issue of Federal’s liability. See MTB Bank v. Federal Armored Express, No. 93 Civ. 5594 (LBS), 1996 WL 445358 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 1996). Now before the Court is MTB’s motion for summary judgment as to damages. For the foregoing reasons, MTB’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

BACKGROUND

MTB is a commercial bank which engages in the sale of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Shindler v. LambNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Aero Garage Corp. v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dr. Gerald R. Finkel v. Allstate Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  2. In re MasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API