Union Stockyards National Bank of South Omaha v. Maika
Wyoming Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court, Johnson- County, Hon. Carroll H. ParmslKE, Judge. The action was brought in the district court by the Union Stockyards National Bank of South Omaha, Nebraska, against Amil E: Maika and Emma Maika. Judgment was rendered • in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff prosecuted error. - The facts are stated in -the opinion. The petition states a valid cause of action.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the District Court, Johnson- County, Hon. Carroll H. ParmslKE, Judge. The action was brought in the district court by the Union Stockyards National Bank of South Omaha, Nebraska, against Amil E: Maika and Emma Maika. Judgment was rendered • in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff prosecuted error. - The facts are stated in -the opinion. The petition states a valid cause of action. It does not appear that defendants were residents of Wyoming prior to January, 1905, when they were served with summons at their residence and it does appear on the petition that prior to that time,…
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This action was commenced in the district court of Johnson County on December 28, 1904, to recover upon an alleged balance claimed to be due from defendants in error to plaintiff in error upon two certain promissory notes. A demurrer was interposed to the petition, and after argument and due consideration the court sustained the demurrer, to which ruling the plaintiff excepted and elected to stand upon its petition. Judgment was rendered against the plaintiff and it brings the case here on error.
1. The defendants in error have filed a motion to strike certain papers from the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harper v. . FairleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Wolford v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Cowhick v. ShingleWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Bender v. MarkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Campbell v. BaldwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Berry v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Boller v. Western Law Associates, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- P. Ballantine & Sons v. MackenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.