Legal Opinion

In re: Peter Szanto

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 2016No. NV-14-1528-FBDUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED JUN 03 2016 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK 2 U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5 In re: ) BAP No. NV-14-1528-FBD ) 6 PETER SZANTO, ) Bk. No. 3:13-51261-GWZ ) 7 Debtor. ) Adv. No. 3:14-05003-GWZ _____________________________ ) 8 ) PETER SZANTO, ) 9 ) Appellant, ) 10 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM* 11 ) JOSEPH M. BISTRITZ, ) 12 ) Appellee. ) 13 ______________________________) 14 Submitted Without Argument on May 19, 2016 15 Filed – June 3, 2016 16 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API