Legal Opinion

State v. Wolfs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1990No. 10-88-01844; CA A60331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. He contends that the court erred by denying his motion to dismiss on former jeopardy grounds. We reverse.

At his first trial, after the state had rested, defendant moved for a “judgment of acquittal” on the ground that the indictment did not set out facts sufficient to establish a crime. The court granted that motion and issued an “Order of Judgment of Acquittal” acquitting defendant, but giving the state leave to resubmit the case. The state resubmitted the case under a new case number and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. De FordOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WolfsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WolfsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API