Legal Opinion

State v. Woodley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1988No. TC 86-173-CR; CA A41196; SC S34898PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Oregon’s Criminal Code makes it a crime to subject another person to unconsented sexual contact, ORS 163.415, and it defines “sexual contact” as

“any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person or causing such person to touch the sexual or other intimate parts of the actor for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of either party.”

ORS 163.305(6). Defendant was indicted for “touching the thigh area and between [the victim’s] breasts” without her consent. He was convicted of attempted sexual abuse. On appeal, he argued that the indictment did not charge a crime…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. CarltonOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. HaleyOregon Supreme Court · 2023

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API