Legal Opinion

Shelford v. New York State Teachers Retirement System

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 28, 1993No. 93 CV 0968 (TCP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, Chief Judge.

Defendant New York State Teachers Retirement System (“NYSTRS”) moves to dis miss the complaint on the grounds that plaintiffs’ Title VII class action claim is barred by the statute of limitations and that the retirement system is a legitimate, gender neutral plan. For the reasons set forth below, this Court finds that plaintiffs’ claim is time-barred and hereby dismisses the complaint without prejudice.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
Shelford v. New York State Teachers Retirement SystemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994