Grant v. Aldermen of Northampton
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The newly elected mayor of Northampton died a few days after he took office at the beginning of the year 1944. By stipulation of the parties the only question to be decided is whether the board of aldermen are now bound to issue their warrant for an election to fill the vacancy.
General Laws (Ter. Ed.) c. 39, § 6, reads in part: “If there is a vacancy in the board of aldermen, in the common council, or in a city or ward office which is to be filled by an election of the people, the board of aldermen shall issue their warrant for an election to fill such vacancy at a time and place designated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crocker v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Elmer v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Hull v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Inhabitants of West Roxbury v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Glover v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Baizen v. Board of Public WorksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Chopelas v. City Clerk of MaldenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973