Legal Opinion

Elmer v. Commissioner of Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 26, 1939PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The ten petitioners have signed an agreement of association, held a meeting of incorporators, and caused articles of organization, records, and by-laws to be submitted to the respondent, all for the purpose of incorporating a mutual insurance company to carry on the business of accident, liability, collision and health insurance as defined in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 47, Sixth. This petition is brought to compel the respondent to “endorse his approval on the articles” as provided in e. 156, § 11, to which reference *195is made in c. 175, § 49. See Wesalo v. Commissioner of Insurance, 299 Mass.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Cochran v. RoemerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. McNeil v. Mayor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. McCarty v. BoydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Kenney v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Johnson v. District Attorney for the Northern DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Jaynes v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API