Legal Opinion
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Rensin (In re Rensin)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided December 13, 2018No. CASE NO. 17-11834-EPK; ADV. PROC. NO. 17-01185-EPKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtErik P. Kimball, Judge
In this adversary proceeding, the Federal Trade Commission asks this Court to determine that the debt represented by a $ 13,400,627.60 compensatory damages award entered by a federal district court is not subject to discharge in Joseph K. Rensin's bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and/or (a)(6).
The Court conducted trial in this matter on August 9, 2018. On October 4, 2018, the plaintiff and the defendant filed post-trial briefs in the form of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. ECF Nos. 106 and 107. The Court has considered the evidence admitted at trial to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Louis S. St. Laurent, Ii, Debtors. Louis S. St. Laurent, II v. William J. Ambrose and Patty A. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. RichertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Wang v. LingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2022
- Warren v. WarrenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2022