Legal Opinion
Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. v. O'Leary
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 9, 1964No. Civ. No. 64-348Published
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
This cause is before the court under "the provisions of 33 U.S.C. § 921(b), on ■a petition to enjoin a compensation award made pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq.
The facts are agreed. On October 14, 1962, one Beegan, while working as a longshoreman for Brady-Hamilton, sustained a minor finger injury. This did not require medical treatment, nor did the claimant lose work time. However, a notice of injury1 was filed with the deputy commissioner and the claimant received a form letter, which stated the date of the injury and assigned it a claim number. Subsequently, on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- John Costello, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Leonard Plumbing and Heating J. A. Fazio and Lawrence C. Ambrose v. J. A. Fazio and Lawrence C. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.