Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1943No. 31091PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment obtained by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, for damages for alleged permanent injury to plaintiff’s land claimed to have been caused by surface and subsurface pollution from salt water permitted to escape from oil wells operated by defendant.

Plaintiff, since some time prior to 1928, was the owner of 320 acres of land in Osage county. Defendant operated a number of oil wells, some of which were on land owned by plaintiff. But most of the wells were located on lands…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colonial Refining Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. United States v. Boston, C. C. & N. Y. Canal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
  3. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Big Five Mining Co. v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Empire Oil & Refining Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greyhound Leasing & Financial Corporation, on Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated v. Joiner City UnitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Goforth v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API