Legal Opinion

Ramberg v. Wahlstrom

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

Appellant and appellee were tenants in common, for a term of years, of a certain lot in the city of Chicago. Eight days ■before the term expired appellant purchased and obtained from their landlord a deed of the fee of the premises, and he-attempted to assert certain rights in regard to the leasehold property by virtue of that deed. The circuit court decreed that appellant, being a tenant in common for a term of years, could not, in equity, without the consent of appellee, become-the owner of the fee, and that he therefore held the title of the fee in trust for appellee as well as for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bracken v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stevens v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Frank v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. London Extension Mining Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. Sharples Corp. v. Sinclair Wyoming Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Gillan v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API