Legal Opinion

Casico, Inc. v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 26, 1997No. 96-007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) ruled that the State statutory scheme governing the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages, see RSA chs. 175-180 (1994 & Supp. 1996) (amended 1997), preempts an ordinance of the defendant, City of Manchester (city). The ordinance requires a city-issued license, independent of the license required by the State, for certain on-premises sales of alcoholic beverages. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Casico, Inc., on the preemption *314issue, but denied the plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees. The city appeals the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Dumont v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Hickingbotham v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Quirk v. Town of New BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Portsmouth Country Club v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. Glick v. NaessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. JTR Colebrook, Inc. v. Town of ColebrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API