Legal Opinion

Hickingbotham v. Burke

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 24, 1995No. 93-237PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiff, Joseph Hickingbotham, sued the defendants, Bonnie Burke and Mark Vemullan, alleging that they, as social hosts, were liable for injuries he suffered after they served him alcohol at a party held at their home. Hickingbotham appeals from the Superior Court’s {Lynn, J.) grant of defendant Burke’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for failure to state a cause of action. Vemullan is in default. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

In October 1990, Burke and Vemullan hosted a Halloween party at their residence in Windham. Hickingbotham’s writ alleges that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. StapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Hacking v. Town of BelmontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Miami Subs Corp. v. Murray Family Trust & Kenneth Dash PartnershipSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API