State Ex Rel. Guy v. Foster
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
* On right to prove absence from demanding state or alibi onhabeas corpus in extradition proceedings, see annotation in 51 A.L.R., 797; 12 R.C.L., 1248; R.C.L. Perm. Supp., p. 3290. This is a habeas corpus proceeding by which the relator, B.F. Guy, resists being extradited to Michigan to answer a charge of receiving stolen property on December 1, 1928, his contention being that he was in Nashville on that date, and hence could not have committed the crime. No question as to constructive presence and actual absence is presented in this case. The trial court, after hearing the evidence,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Hogan v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Vanvabry v. StatonTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- GermainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Anderson County v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. GroschTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Johnson v. MainardTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Bedford v. McCorkleTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Merchants & Manufacturers Transfer Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Van Scoyoc v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.