Legal Opinion

Peng v. F.M. Tarbell Co. CA2/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 2021No. B307484Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/27/21 Peng v. F.M. Tarbell Co. CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO BO PENG, B307484 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCP00416) v. F.M. TARBELL CO., Defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Laffitte v. Robert Half International Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Sessions Payroll Management, Inc. v. Noble Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API