Legal Opinion

State v. Houtz

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1986No. 20608PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Robert Glen Houtz was convicted, in absentia, for automobile homicide, drunk driving, hit and run driving, and failure to report an accident. He claims that the trial court erred in proceeding with the jury trial in defendant’s absence. The State candidly concedes the mistake below and agrees that the convictions should be reversed for retrial.

Defendant’s trial was scheduled for the morning of February 26, 1985, in Beaver, Utah. When defendant did not appear, the court continued the trial until the next morning, February 27, 1985. 1 Defendant again did not appear that morning, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. AikersUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. MyersUtah Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HubbardUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. WanosikUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. GarzaWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BurkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API