Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2003No. 72959-0PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 P.3d 347 (2003)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Benjamin GARZA, Petitioner.

No. 72959-0.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 9, 2003.

Washington Appellate Project, Stephen Kim, Elaine Winters, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Daniel Clark, Deputy County Prosecutor, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

Defendant Benjamin Garza claims that his constitutional right to be present at trial was violated when his jury trial for attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle proceeded in his absence. When Garza did not appear in court on time after his trial was underway,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Madsen; Concurrence · Sanders.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. StrodeWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API