Legal Opinion
State v. Wanosik
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 2003No. 20010809PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
T1 Petitioner, the State of Utah, appeals the decision of the Utah Court of Appeals vacating respondent Anthony Wanosik's sentence and remanding for resentencing. The court held the State had not met its burden of proof with respect to the voluntariness of Wanosik's absence. In addition, the court held the trial court did not comply with the requirements of Utah Rule of Criminal Procedure 22(a), and that the defendant's due process rights regarding sentencing were violated.
BACKGROUND
12 The facts of this case are largely…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HarmonUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- K.Z. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- People v. StephensonColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.