Legal Opinion

Sellers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 24, 1989No. 88-1179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Sellers appeals the decision of the district court finding that, as a matter of law, the government owed no duty to Sellers’s ward for the conduct of Allen Firestine, who was treated for manic depression at the Veteran’s Administration Hospital (VAH) in Battle Creek, Michigan. Sellers’s ward, Terrance Sellers, was severely beaten by Fir-estine on February 17, 1985. Firestine had been an inpatient and was still receiving outpatient treatment at the time of the incident. Sellers filed suit against the VAH under the Federal Tort Claims Acts (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., for negligent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gary L. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. McIntosh v. MilanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William F. Glarner v. United States of America, Department of Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Rivera v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Anna Rousey, Individually and as Administratrix for the Estates of Palmer Lee Rousey and Fred Marion Alsman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Matthews v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Sellers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API