Legal Opinion

Cantu v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 29, 1986No. 13-85-437-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Appellant pled guilty to possession of marijuana of less than fifty pounds but over five pounds and elected to have a jury determine his punishment. Though he requested probation, the jury assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and an $8,000 fine. His sole ground of error on appeal is that the trial court erred in failing to require the presence of an interpreter during the entire proceedings. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 38.30 (Vernon Supp.1986) states, “[W]hen a motion for appointment of an interpreter is filed by any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Vargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  3. Frescas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1982
  4. Ex Parte NanesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Mares v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montoya v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  2. Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Nguyen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Ex Parte: Koffi Semegnon Doke, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API