Flores v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for sale of heroin. Punishment was assessed by the jury at two hundred and fifty years.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is not challenged.

At the outset, appellant contends that the court erred in not granting his motion for an interpreter.

In Diaz v. State, 491 S.W.2d 166, it was stated, “The only basis for a trial court providing an interpreter to an accused is the constitutional and statutory guarantees of confrontation under the Constitutions of Texas and of the United States. Ex parte Marez, 464 S.W.2d…