People v. Llamas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Appellant Frankie Llamas was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance while armed with a firearm, vehicle taking, receiving stolen property, possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a controlled substance. He appeals, arguing insufficient evidence of auto taking, receiving stolen property and possession of a firearm by a felon, error in the preclusion of a defense witness, in the denial of his Marsden 2 motion and in the response given to a jury question. He further claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WhitmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. BollaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
- People v. LlamasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.