Legal Opinion

People v. Llamas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1997No. Docket Nos. D024368, D026009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Appellant Frankie Llamas was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance while armed with a firearm, vehicle taking, receiving stolen property, possession of a firearm by a felon and possession of a controlled substance. He appeals, arguing insufficient evidence of auto taking, receiving stolen property and possession of a firearm by a felon, error in the preclusion of a defense witness, in the denial of his Marsden 2 motion and in the response given to a jury question. He further claims prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. WhitmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. BollaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  5. People v. LlamasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API