Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Gabriel Almanza-Arenas (“Al-manza-Arenas”) petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision affirming a final order of removal. The BIA held that Almanza-Arenas was ineligible for cancellation of removal because he was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. Almanza-Arenas was convicted under California Vehicle Code § 10851(a), a statute that criminalizes both conduct that would constitute a crime of moral turpitude, and conduct that does not amount to a crime of moral turpitude. We hold that Almanza-Arenas’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Anh Le v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ValdezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Mendez-SosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.