Legal Opinion

People v. Whitmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 2014No. B231038BPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

Appellant Jeffrey Allen Whitmer challenges his convictions on 20 counts of grand theft and 20 counts of making false financial statements. He contends he was unlawfully convicted of grand theft and making false financial statements; in addition, he maintains that his judgment of conviction must be reversed due to insufficiency of the evidence, instructional error, sentencing error, and ineffective assistance of counsel.

In our original opinion (People v. Whitmer (Cal.App.)), we determined that appellant had shown reversible error only with respect to certain counts of making…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lacagnina v. Comprehend Sys., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. ZamarripaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. Liu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. Sawyers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API