State ex rel. Baker v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by respondent from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, Otis, and Kelly, JJ., granting relator’s petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus and denying respondent’s motion to discharge the alternative writ.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Sp. Laws 1876, c. 214, provided the manner of selecting, drawing, summoning, and impaneling grand and petit jurors of the district court in Ramsey county. It was amended by Sp. Laws 1877, c. 182; Sp. Laws 1879, c. 93; Sp. Laws 1883, c. 52; and *284Sp. Laws 1887, c. 94. The law as so amended, though a public law, is clearly a special law, applying to Ramsey county alone. It provided, among other things, that such jurors residing in the city of St. Paul should recover for their services $1 per day, and those residing beyond the limits of the city $1.50 per day. An amendment to the constitution…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alexander v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State ex rel. Childs v. CopelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Jackson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- In Re JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.