Legal Opinion
Kanae v. Hodson
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 5, 2003No. Civil 02-00399 SOM/LEKPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT KAHIKI HODSON’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF HAWAII’S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff Keola N. Kanae alleges that Defendant Kahiki Hodson and Defendant County of Hawaii (“the County”) are liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Kanae asserts that Hodson, a police officer, used excessive force when he shot Kanae while apprehending him. Kanae, claiming that the County should have reprimanded Hodson, says that the failure to reprimand demonstrates a County policy for which the County is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kaur v. City of LodiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Hernandez v. City of NapaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Peschel v. City of Missoula ex rel. Missoula Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Long v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
- Ogden Ex Rel. Estate of Ogden v. Coutny of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.