Legal Opinion
Long v. City and County of Honolulu
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 11, 2005No. CIV. 02-00271SPK/KSCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REVISED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Officer Patrick A. Sterling and the City and County of Honolulu renew their motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, primarily asserting there are no material questions of fact as to (1) qualified immunity for Officer Sterling, and (2) “deliberate indifference” on the “Monell claim” for municipal liability against the City. Common law claims are also addressed, although disposition of the state law claims follows from the rulings on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kaur v. City of LodiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Logan v. The City of SchenectadyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Long v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007