Legal Opinion

Svendsen v. Smith's Moving & Trucking Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion of that court (76 AD2d 504). In response to appellant’s arguments advanced before us, we add the following observations : (1) the mandate of the due process clause of the New York State Constitution (art I, § 6), because it is a constitutional provision, takes precedence over the uniformity provision of the Uniform Commercial Code (§ 1-102, subd [2], par [c]); (2) the 1980 amendment of article 9 of the Lien Law in an effort to correct the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Svendsen v. Smith's Moving & Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Citibank, N.A. v. BenkoczyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1983
  2. Jefferds v. EllisNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Dupont v. Joedon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Henderson v. HolleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API