Legal Opinion

Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

On this appeal we consider whether plaintiff-merchant can maintain an action under UCC 7-210 for damages allegedly caused by defendants’ conduct in the sale of commercial goods in order to satisfy a lien for unpaid warehouse charges. We agree with the Appellate Division that there was insufficient evidence of willful conduct to hold defendants liable for conversion damages under UCC 7-210 (9). However, a question exists as to whether defendants may be held liable for a nonwillful violation of the statute and the matter must be remitted for a new trial on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. I.C.C. Metals, Inc. v. Municipal Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Svendsen v. Smith's Moving & Trucking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Shimamoto v. S&F Warehouses, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Grant v. Superior Moving & Storage, Inc. (In Re Grant)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Honique Accessories, Ltd. v. S.J. Stile Associates, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Inline, Inc. v. Apace Moving Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Miller's Turnkey Transport, Inc. v. Cybertek, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. PDK Labs, Inc. v. G.M.G. Trans West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. PDK Labs, Inc. v. G.M.G. Trans West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API