Legal Opinion
Jefferds v. Ellis
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
By a motion brought under the provisions of CPLR article 71 the plaintiff seeks an order directing the defendant to return a certain “truck tractor” taken from the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant contests the motion on the grounds that the retaking was authorized under the provisions of UCC 9-503 and 9-504.
The agreement in issue is termed a “Lease Purchase Agreement.” It consists of a single paragraph of 21 typewritten lines. It is not completed on any printed or statutory form and appears to have been “home drafted.”
Under its terms the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Briggs v. . OliverNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Svendsen v. Smith's Moving & Trucking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Svendsen v. Smith's Moving & Trucking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TrackwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Credit Car Leasing Corp. v. DeCresenzoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
- U S West Financial Services, Inc. v. Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re WinstonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Jefferds v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.