Legal Opinion

Scott v. Staggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1954No. Civ. 4791PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action for partition of real and personal property and for an accounting. Plaintiff and appellant Orville R. Scott and defendants and respondents Roy R. Staggs and his wife, Bessie, acquired certain unimproved real property in Crestline Village. Plaintiff owned a one-half interest and defendants Staggs, as joint tenants, owned the other one-half interest. Plaintiff paid one-half of its cost price and the Staggs paid the other one-half. By oral agreement, they agreed that it would be improved with rental buildings and that the income therefrom would be divided on a 50-50 basis. This…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Ochoa v. McCushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In Re Estate of BenvenutoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chapin v. GrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. People v. ClineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Gillmor v. GillmorUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Regalado v. RegaladoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API