Schwartz v. Schneuriger

Fifteen assignments of error are made by the appellant, as follows:

“1. Anton Schneuriger was negligent with respect to position on the highway as a matter of law.

“2. As a matter of law, Clarence G. Schwartz was not negligent with respect to position on the highway, there being no credible evidence to sustain such finding.

“3. There is no evidence whatsoever that Schwartz’s lookout was not proper.

“4. There is no credible evidence in the record to support the jury’s finding that Schwartz was negligent as to management and control.

“5. Jury finding that Schwartz was negligent as to both lookout…