Legal Opinion

People v. Raymundo B.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1988No. F009521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, J.

Raymundo B. appeals his commitment to the California Youth Authority. His principal contention is that he was denied his constitutional right to a separate interpreter during the proceedings below. We affirm.

Statement of the Case

On September 8, 1987, a supplemental petition was filed in the Juvenile Court of Kings County alleging that the minor, Raymundo B., came within the provisions of section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and charging him with one felony count of burglary of a vehicle in violation of Penal Code section 459 and one misdemeanor count of theft in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ceja v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Jefferson v. Compton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. State v. SelallaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. $17,522.08 UNITED STATES CURRENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. In re H.T. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API