Legal Opinion

People v. $17,522.08 UNITED STATES CURRENCY

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 2006No. H028795PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.

In this civil forfeiture proceeding under Health and Safety Code section 11469 et seq., 1 we consider whether a claimant must be expressly informed of and expressly waive on the record his or her constitutional and statutory right to a jury trial. Appellant Estella Pierce, who represented herself throughout the forfeiture proceedings at issue in this case, contends that the judgment of forfeiture must be reversed as the record is silent as to whether she knowingly waived her right to a jury trial or gave informed consent to a court trial. Appellant also…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. KINEYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. People v. $2,709 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. Snyder CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Super. Ct. (Vandenburgh)California Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API