Legal Opinion

Nagi v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $30,000. Defendant brings error. Two questions were disposed of correctly by the trial judge in deciding a reserved motion to direct a verdict for defendant:

“The meritorious question presented under this motion is, whether plaintiff upon his own showing is precluded from recovery by carelessness on his part which either occasioned or contributed towards his injury; and secondly, whether there is any testimony tending to show negligent operation of the defendant’s interurban street car.
“The plaintiff’s testimony, giving to it that favorable construction…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Clumfoot v. St. Clair Tunnel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Krouse v. Southern Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Currie v. FitingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pippen v. Denison Division of Abex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. DeLisleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Bouverette v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API