Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Richter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1998No. 003 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1997PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*509 OPINION

CASTILLE, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to address whether a court can properly admit evidence in a rape trial of the defendant’s past sexual assaults against the victim to explain the victim’s failure to resist and to establish that the intercourse occurred through forcible compulsion or the threat of forcible compulsion. For the reasons expressed herein, we affirm the Superi- or Court.

On October 27, 1994, a jury found appellant guilty of the rape,1 indecent assault,2 and unlawful restraint3 of his ex-wife. Appellant was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of six to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. BronshteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. GalindesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. PageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API