Legal Opinion
Blacker v. Rod
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1952No. 1133PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
We are asked to review an order vacating a default judgment. The action grows out of the sale of a house to the plaintiff. The contract contains the name of defendant Harry Rod throughout as broker and as agent and is signed “Biron & Rod, Inc., by Harry Rod, Treas.” Defendant was the person with whom the plaintiff dealt. According to the complaint, defendant made certain promises to repair and remodel the house in question. Alleging that he failed -to do so, plaintiff instituted suit in May 1950.
Defendant was served with process on .August 14, 1950. He left the suit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Wilford v. Sigmund Eisner Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Naglieri v. TrabattoniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- United States v. KlapprottDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. HillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Harco, Inc. v. Greenville Steel and Foundry CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Holden v. PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Tennille v. TennilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Investment Bankers of America, Inc. v. SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.