Legal Opinion

David A. Ryker Painting Co. v. Nunamaker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 2004No. 49A05-0405-CV-252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant David A. Ryker Painting Co., Inc. (Ryker) appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of its employee, appellee-plaintiff - George - Nunamaker. Specifically, Ryker raises two issues, which we consolidate and restate as one disposi-tive issue: whether the trial court erred as a matter of law by concluding that Nuna-maker was entitled to maintain a claim under Indiana Code section 22-2-5-1, the Wage Payment Statute. Concluding that the Wage Payment Statute has no application in this case, we reverse.

FACTS

On January 14, 1998, Ryker bid on a sub-contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Valadez v. R.T. Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. FILLMORE LLC v. Fillmore MacHine & Tool Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. DAVID A. RYKER PAINTING CO. v. NunamakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DAVID A. RYKER PAINTING CO. v. NunamakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API