Legal Opinion
DAVID A. RYKER PAINTING CO. v. Nunamaker
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 2006No. 49S05-0509-CV-399PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Petition To Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A05-0405-CV-252
DICKSON, Justice.
In this labor wage dispute asserting application of the Indiana Wage Payment Statute, the defendant, David A. Ryker Painting Company, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of an employee, the plaintiff, George E. Nunamaker. We reverse.
The plaintiff filed suit against Ryker Painting for punitive damages and attorney fees pursuant to the Wage Payment Statute after the defendant’s alleged failure to pay him at a proper rate in a timely manner for work performed on a painting project for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Valadez v. R.T. Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Osler Institute, Inc. v. InglertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Osler Institute, Inc. v. InglertIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Berry v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- DAVID A. RYKER PAINTING CO. v. NunamakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Tim Berry, Auditor of State M. Caroline Spotts, Principal Clerk of the House of Representatives and The State of Indiana/ Brian C. Bosma, Speaker v. William CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2013