Legal Opinion

Shipman v. Evans

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2004No. 20020103PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs Robert C. Shipman, Kathleen M. Rollman, and Dale Sweat appeal rulings of the trial court dismissing their challenge to the legality of actions contemplated by certain West Jordan officials and denying plaintiffs their attorney fees. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 This appeal is the byproduct of a contentious episode in the civic history of West Jordan City, Utah. The relevant facts span the political and judicial realms and do not lend themselves to summary recitation. The complexity of the events and elevated passions of the participants 1 have combined to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Carlton v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Navajo Nation v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Utahns for Better Dental Health-Davis, Inc. v. Davis County ClerkUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API