Legal Opinion
Hindman v. Thompson
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 2008No. 05-CV-306-TCK-PJCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TERENCE KERN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the State of Oklahoma’s (“State”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 37), Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 83), 1 and Defendant Donald Thompson’s Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 45).
1. Background
In March 1999, Plaintiff Zelma Hindman (“Plaintiff’) was hired by then-Creek County District Judge Donald Thompson (“Thompson” or “Defendant Thompson”) as his secretary/bailiff. During 2001, Plaintiff viewed a “tube with a cylinder” under Judge Thompson’s bench (later identified as a “penis pump”) on…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kilcrease v. Domenico Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Hawley v. KH Government Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Mathews v. City of Booneville, MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2020
- McWain v. Clay TownshipDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Ray Westall Operating, Inc. v. RichardDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.