Grogan v. Vache
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, County of Monterey. None of the defendants, except Thompson, appeared in the action. The defendant Thompson recovered judgment, and the plaintiff appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
The plaintiff sued for the recovery of the Rancho Los Paieines, containing two leagues of land; and on the trial he proved his title to all of the rancho, except such portion thereof as was conveyed to Thompson, one of the defendants, by a deed executed by the widow and three of the children of Rodrigues (one of the grantees of the rancho); and except also such right, title, or interest in the last mentioned portion as was sold to Thompson by Villegas, the plaintiff’s grantor. In the deed of the widow and children of Rodrigues to Thompson, the land is described as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Schenk v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Corbin v. Jackson ex dem. GarnseyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
- Jackson, ex rel. Garnsey v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cullen v. SpriggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Jory v. Palace Dry Goods Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Ames v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hodge v. BennettMississippi Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.